Location:Home > mesothelioma news > the Langoulant report said this did not include the overall cost of the operation and further asses

the Langoulant report said this did not include the overall cost of the operation and further asses

Time:2018-02-23 04:24mesothelioma | mesothelioma lawyers Website Click:

special inqui health WA News langoulant report special inquiry report

State Special Inquirer John Langoulant has named the contract awarded to Serco for Fiona Stanley Hospital services the single "worst case of financial risk taking for the State" across the entire scope of his inquiry into the previous government's management of 31 major projects from 2008-2017.   

The former under-treasurer examined eight Health projects, five being significant infrastructure projects costing more than $8.2 billion, and while some were considered well managed and good value for money, others were seen as evidence of highly risky decisionmaking.

Fiona Stanley Hospital's contract with Serco has worked well in practice.

Fiona Stanley Hospital's contract with Serco has worked well in practice.  Photo: Peter Bennetts / Fiona Stanley Hospital Design Collaboration

While not taking substantive issue with much of the report, WA Health pointed out in its responses that many process improvements had taken place over the nine years the report covered. 

While there have been several inquiries into FSH, this one focused on the $4.3 billion Serco services contract and the decision-making process for outsourcing those services in the first place.

Related Articles

The report found there was no way of knowing if FSH's Serco contract was delivering value for money. There was no stand-alone business case for the decision and logical opportunities to prepare one between 2009 and 2010 were missed.

WA Health referred the inquiry to a 2007 business case, but this did not directly refer to outsourcing of facilities management.


When questioned by the Special Inquirer about the decision to proceed with an outsourced facilities management model, WA Health advised: "It was always intended in the development of the original business case about leaving the option in to outsource."

You will now receive updates from News Update Newsletter

News Update Newsletter

Get the latest news and updates emailed straight to your inbox.

By submitting your email you are agreeing to Fairfax Media's terms and conditions and privacy policy.

The report found a standalone case could have helped avoid the problems that dogged the hospital, including the withdrawal from the sterilisation service contract seven months after the opening.

The inquiry found no cost benefit analysis, no assessment of clinical and other risks and poorly-scoped financial modelling.

"It is astonishing further consideration was not given to preparing a stand-alone business case for a $4.3 billion contract, especially given the complexity and uniqueness of the project, the workforce implications and the financial and non-financial risks to the state," the report said.

Given this, the state was "fortunate" the contract had ended up successful.

It remained "unsatisfactory" that WA Health was unable to understand readily what savings it was making compared with providing the same services itself.

"We are just lucky frankly that it has worked out to be a reasonable contract ... you need something better than luck," Mr Langoulant told Radio 6PR on Tuesday.

The report also investigated the $1.16 billion Perth Children's Hospital, finding that though it remained within budget, it was projected to open four years after the original projected date.

There was no way of predicting cost blowouts that were still possible due to outstanding defects, contractual claims and continuing additional works.

Perth Children's Hospital is on budget. So far.

Perth Children's Hospital is on budget. So far. Photo: Richard Wainwright

It said while planning, procurement and the appointment of John Holland as a contractor were reasonable, there had been poor oversight of John Holland and the PCH steering committees and taskforces.

These governmental units had struggled to work together productively amid the tensions of escalating issues and delays, including lead in the water supply and asbestos found in building materials. 

The report also criticised the drafting of the contract to outsource the management of the Queen Elizabeth II car park. It said the contract had failed to allow for potential delays in the delivery of PCH, or for the state to cap parking costs for hospital staff.

This meant the state had by August 2017 already paid nearly $16 million in compensation to the private provider, Capella. The taxpayer was now effectively subsidising the capped staff rates and the car park had been and continued to be a financial burden on the State.

It remained "questionable" whether the public-private partnership model would eventually generate value for money for taxpayers.

Copyright infringement? Click Here!